
 After the Israeli attack on Iraq’s under-construction French-built  nuclear Osirak-type reactor, Tammuz-I, south of Baghdad on 7 June 1981,  Pakistan felt that it would be the next target of an Israeli  misadventure. The Israeli Air Force (IDF/AF) had, at first, explored the  possibility of such a plan and, later, put together operational plans  for a possible air strike against Kahuta in the 1980s using satellite  photo and intelligence information provided by the US Central  Intelligence Agency (CIA). These operational plans are still kept  updated in the Headquarters of the IDF/AF and pilots of some specially  assigned IDF/AF F-16 and F-15 squadrons are given special training  exercises to carry out mock attacks on Kahuta. So much so that a  full-scale mock-up of the Kahuta facility was built in the southern  Negev Desert for the IDF/AF pilots to train on.
   
     
The Kahuta plan  was made concurrently with the plan to attack Osirak using the same  pilots of the Iraq mission, if it went through successfully. The  Israelis planned to either use Indian airbases or fly non-stop from  Israel to Kahuta while refuelling their aircraft using airborne tankers.  Israeli Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) aircraft would jam  Pakistani air defence radar while the Israelis took out Kahuta - or at  least attempted to do so. 
To this effect, India had played its  part in cajoling and trying to convince Israel to carry this ill-advised  plan through. However, Israel was insisting on using Indian air bases  but India was reluctant to allow them such a facility for fear of  sparking of another Indo-Pak war. According to a paper published by the  Australian Institute for National Strategic Studies, “Israeli interest  in destroying Pakistan’s Kahuta reactor to scuttle the "Islamic bomb"  was blocked by India's refusal to grant landing and refueling rights to  Israeli warplanes in 1982.” India wanted to see Kahuta gone but did not  want to face the blame or the retaliation nor bear any responsibility.  Israel, on its part wanted it to be seen as a joint Indo-Israeli strike  so that responsibility could be shared. The Reagan Administration was  against this plan, not out of any love for Pakistan’s nuclear programme,  but because at that time it was busy fighting the Soviet Union in  Afghanistan and considered Pakistan a key ally in the conflict. It  informed Israel and India that it could not support such a plan. This  plan, therefore, never materialized and was indefinitely postponed, and  rightly so, after Pakistan reminded the Israelis that they were not the  Iraqis and the Pakistan Air Force was not the Iraqi Air Force. Through  indirect channels, Pakistan had also conveyed the message to Israel, if  Kahuta was attacked, Pakistan would lay waste to Dimona, Israel’s  nuclear reactor in the Negev Desert.
Pakistan, however, was not  taking any chances. Soon after the Osirak raid in 1981, then President  Zia-ul-Haq of Pakistan directed PAF Air Headquarters (AHQ) to make  contingency plans for a possible Israeli attack on Kahuta. In lieu  thereof, the PAF Chief of Air Staff issued an Air Tasking Order to the  Air Officer Commanding of the Air Defence Command to take suitable  measures for the air defence of Kahuta and prepare a contingency plan  for a retaliatory PAF strike on Dimona, in case Kahuta was attacked. As a  follow-up to this directive, a special Operations Room was established  at AHQ, Chaklala to oversee the task of defending Pakistan’s strategic  nuclear facilities at Kahuta and Karachi. A study of the air defence  ground environment of Kahuta was carried out and gaps and weaknesses in  the air defences were filled and strengthened. On 10 July 1982, a  special contingency plan was issued. In the event of an Israeli attack  on Pakistan's strategic installations, plans were drawn up for a  retaliatory Pakistani strike on Dimona. The strike would be carried out  by Mirage III/Vs. When Pakistan received 40 General Dynamics Block  F-16A/Bs from the US from 15 January 1983 onwards, this new weapons  system too was incorporated in Pakistan’s contingency plan to carry out  retaliatory strikes on Dimona.
In the backdrop of the above  scenario, it was, therefore, not surprising that in the aftermath of the  Indian nuclear tests of 13 May 1998, Pakistan felt that there was a  strong possibility of a joint Indo-Israeli strike against Pakistan's  nuclear installations. The PAF had an essential role to play in  defending Pakistan's strategic installations and airspace to thwart any  such plan. The tensions were so high that a PAF F-16 flying low over the  Ras Koh test site in the Chagai District of Balochistan on the eve of  the Pakistani nuclear tests was, for a moment, mistaken by the personnel  on the ground, to be an Israeli warplane. The incident sparked off a  diplomatic squabble between Pakistan and Israel, with the Israeli  Ambassador in Washington D.C. denying the existence of any such plan.
Then  Pakistan's Ambassador to the United Nations, Ahmed Kamal told CNN that  Pakistan had reliable information about Indian intentions to launch air  strikes against Pakistan's nuclear test facilities. Kamal told CNN that  if India strikes, Pakistan's response would be "massive" and would "bode  ill for peace."
"We're involved in this threat and in making  sure that it does not arise because if it does, the world must  understand that Pakistan is ready, that it will react, that the reaction  will be massive and dissuasive, and that it would lead us into a  situation which would bode ill for peace and security, not only in the  region, but beyond," Kamal said.
  

As soon as the decision to  conduct the nuclear tests had been taken, the PAF was ordered to assume  air defence duties over Chagai and the strategic nuclear installations  of Pakistan, including Kahuta, Nilore, Fatehjung, Chashma, Khushab and  Karachi.
Operation Bedaar ’98: PAF Squadron Roles during Chagai
The  PAF operations for the defence of Pakistan’s strategic nuclear  installations during the May 1998 nuclear tests were codenamed  “Operation Bedaar ’98” by the PAF.
This was a unique operation in which all four PAF command sector Headquarters (HQ) were involved, namely:
(a)  HQ NORSEC (Northern Sector) based at PAF Chaklala (Rawalpindi, Punjab)  and falling under the control of the Northern Air Command (NAC) at  Peshawar;
(b) HQ CENSEC (Central Sector) under the Central Air Command (CAC) and both based at PAF Sargodha (Punjab);
(c) HQ WESSEC (Western Sector) based at PAF Base Samungli (Quetta, Balochistan) also falling under the command of CAC; and
(d)  HQ SOUSEC (Southern Sector) based at PAF Faisal (Karachi, Sindh) and  falling under the control of the Southern Air Command (SAC), also based  at Karachi.
No. 6 Air Transport Squadron (ATS) Squadron, equipped  with C-130 “Hercules” medium-lift tactical transport aircraft and based  at PAF Base Chaklala, commanded by Group Captain Sarfraz Ahmad Khan,  extended the necessary logistical support to the rest of the PAF  squadrons that were being redeployed for air defence alert (ADA) duties.  The Squadron carried a total of 12,66,615 lbs. loads in 71 separate  sorties during the nuclear tests.
No. 7 Tactical Attack (TA)  Squadron, equipped with ex-Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) Mirage III  EAs having recently undergone Retrofit of Strike Element (ROSE I)  upgrades at the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex (PAC), Kamra and based at  PAF Base Masroor (Karachi, Sindh), commanded by Wg. Cdr. Shahid Mahmood  were moved to PAF Base Shabaz (Jacobabad, Balochistan) for day-night ADA  duties. This squadron is now due to be transformed into a multi-role  squadron following the ROSE upgrades and after being equipped with new  radar.
The PAF’s elite No. 9 Multi-Role (MR) Squadron “Griffins”  (falling under No. 34 Wing led by Grp. Capt. Shahid Shigri), equipped  with F-16As, commanded by Wg. Cdr. Azher Hasan, was deployed at PAF  Samungli (Quetta, Balochistan) on 27 May 1998 to provide night-time air  defence cover to the nuclear test sites at Ras Koh and Kharan.
No.  11 MR Squadron "Arrows" (No. 34 Wing), equipped with F-16A/Bs commanded  by Gp. Capt. Akhtar H. Bukhari was moved to PAF Shabaz for day-night  ADA duties on 24 May 1998.
No. 14 MR Squadron “The Tail  Choppers”, equipped with F-7P aircraft and based at PAF Sargodha,  commanded by Wg. Cdr. M. Jamshaid Khan, was deployed at PAF Base  Chaklala for the point defence of KRL, Kahuta; PINSTECH, Nilore and NDC,  Fatehjung.
No. 17 Air Superiority (AS) Squadron "Tigers"  (falling under No. 31 Wing led by Grp. Capt. Rashid Hasan Bukhari), then  equipped with F-6 aircraft and commanded by Wg. Cdr. Muhammad Jamil  Memon carried out standing day-time Combat Air Patrol (CAP) missions  from its parent base, PAF Base Samungli and its Forward Operational  Bases (FOBs), PAF Bases Shahbaz and Sukker (Sindh) respectively. No. 17  Squadron was re-quipped with F-7PG aircraft from China on 27 March 2002.
No.  23 Squadron "Talons" (No. 31 Wing), then equipped with F-6 aircraft and  based at PAF Base Samungli, commanded by Wg. Cdr. Ghulam Mustafa Abbasi  was deployed at PAF Base Sukker for about a week for day-time ADA  duties. Members of the Squadron who participated in the ADA duties  included Wg. Cdr. Irfan Idrees, Sqn. Ldr. Khan Maqbool, Flt. Lt. Anwer  Karim, Flt. Lt. S. Atta, Flt. Lt. Waqas Moshin, Flt. Lt. Zeeshan Saeed,  Flt. Lt. Aamir Shaukat, Flt. Lt. Ali Asher, Flt. Lt. Nadeem Afzal and  Flt. Lt. Nasir Jamal. No. 23 Squadron is also scheduled to be re-quipped  with F-7PG aircraft from China later this year.
At PAF Base  Samungli, F-6 aircraft belonging to the re-equipped No. 25 MR Squadron  (now a SAGEM-upgraded Mirage V EF (ROSE II) squadron) and which were  being kept in reduced flying status (hot storage) by the Field  Maintenance Unit (FMU) at the Base were also activated and made  operational in a day’s notice for emergency back-up if the need arose.
No.  314 Ground Combateers Wing of the PAF, located at PAF Samungli was  tasked with providing enhanced ground security cover to the F-16s of  Nos. 9 and 11 Squadrons deployed at the Base.
No. 481 Control  & Reporting Centre (CRC) based at PAF Base, Lahore, along with seven  Mobile Pulse-Doppler Radar (MPDR), was deployed at designated sites  till the exercise was called off on 1 June 1998. No. 482 CRC based at  PAF Base Malir (Karachi) deployed its MPDR-45 radar in the Sukker area  at short notice on 21 May 1998. The radar handled a number of CAP  missions that were launched to counter any aerial threat to the nuclear  installations. No. 484 CRC based at PAF Chaklala remained on usual alert  for the point defence of Kahuta. No. 486 CRC based at PAF Chaklala  since November 1985 has been exclusive assigned to the task of defending  Pakistan’s nuclear installations. It deployed its MPDR-90P radar at  Pasni, Balochistan at short notice to detect any attack approaching from  the sea. No. 403, a mobile Squadron based at PAF Base, Lahore and  equipped with TPS-43G high altitude surveillance radar also participated  in Bedaar’98. No. 408 Squadron based at PAF Malir, (near Karachi) and  equipped with FPS-20A high-altitude long range static radar and TPS-43G  high altitude radar successfully controlled a number of hot CAP mission  and intercepted US Navy aircraft flying close to Pakistan’s 12 nautical  mile wide territorial sea. Incidentally, this was the same squadron that  participated in the several joint PAF/USN exercises called "Inspired  Alert" between 1994 and 1997 in which the Squadron had experienced an  opportunity to intercept aircraft like the F-14s and F-18s. No. 410  Squadron equipped with TPS-43G radar provided round-the-clock operations  and controlled 26 high altitude CAPS during Operation Bedaar’98. No.  4091 Squadron based at Kirana Hills near Sargodha and equipped with  Siemens MPDR-90 low-level static radar located at a height of 1,600  feet, provided a surveillance capability for the point defence of  Sargodha Air Base and the Central Ammunition Depot (CAD) with its  ability to detect aircraft flying at low level at extended ranges.
No.  541 Squadron, a mobile Surface-to-Air-Missile (SAM) squadron based at  PAF Chaklala, and equipped with Crotale 2000 performed its duties for  the point defence of Kahuta. No. 904 Squadron, based at Murree and  equipped with MPDR-90S radar provided both independent and hooked-up  mode operations with No. 486 CRC by providing early warning on low and  medium level ingressing aircraft towards the national vital points from  Indian-occupied Jammu & Kashmir. No. 451 Squadron, a mobile SAM  squadron based at PAF Chaklala, and equipped with the Crotale 2000 SAM  system provided air defence to the Kahuta and Nilore area. No. 454  Squadron, a mobile SAM squadron based PAF Chaklala, and equipped with  the Crotale 2000 SAM system provided air defence cover to the national  vital points. No. 455 Squadron, a mobile SAM squadron, deployed in the  Kilo area and equipped with the Crotale 4000 SAM system provided air  defence cover to the national vital points. No. 242 Squadron, a mobile  SAM squadron, based at PAF Base Rafiqui, and equipped with the French  Mistral SAM system provided air defence cover to PAF air bases. No.471  Squadron, a SAM squadron, based at PAF Chaklala and equipped with the  Black Arrow (Chinese Red Flag II) high-altitude SAM system provided  day-night air defence coverage upto 80,000 feet over the Kahuta, Nilore  and Fatehjung area.
It was felt that a joint Indo-Israeli attack  could target not only Pakistan's nuclear installations but the nuclear  test sites at Ras Koh and Kharan as well. According to intelligence  reports, US and Indian intelligence did not know about the Kharan Desert  site, which came as a total surprise to them. To counter any high-level  threat emanating from the west or south-west, a TPS-43G high level  radar had been permanently deployed in the Quetta area since October  1982. The same radar was, therefore, used to provide surveillance on all  flying aircraft in the Chagai area.
Dalbandin Airfield had an  important role to play during Pakistan’s May 1998 nuclear tests. In  fact, two names gained prominence around the world during the tests: (i)  Chagai Hills and (ii) Dalbandin airfield. Dalbandin is located among  sand dunes some 30 km south-east of the Chagai Hills near the  Pakistan-Afghanistan Border. The Koh Khambaran Massif in the Ras Koh  Mountain Range, the site of Pakistan's nuclear test, lies south of the  Chagai Hills and Dalbandin.
The airfield at Dalbandin was  constructed in 1935 to serve as a satellite for Samungli Air Base at  Quetta. During the Second World War, it was made operational by the  Royal Air Force in order to counter a possible Russian invasion through  Iran and Afghanistan. During the 1970s, Dalbandin remained a disused  airfield. Although the airstrip is visible from extremely high altitude,  pilots making landing approaches often find the airstrip disappearing  from view, with sand dunes and sand collected on the runway obscuring it  - like a natural camouflage. Dust storms are frequent and cause delays  in take-off and landing schedules. The airfield was taken over by the  Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) in 1985, it received a major face-lift  and overhaul, which provided modern navigational aids, air traffic  control facilities, a passenger terminal and a paved runway. There are  regularly scheduled Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) services to  the airport. While not a military facility, this airfield is available  to the PAF for emergency landing and recovery of aircraft during  peacetime and wartime. During May 1998, Dalbandin air field became the  centre of activity for all personnel, military and civilian, flying to  and from the nuclear tests sites to the rest of the country.
The  nuclear devices were themselves flown in semi-knocked down (SKD)  sub-assembly form on two flights of PAF C-130 Hercules tactical  transport aircraft from PAF Chaklala in northern Punjab to Dalbandin  airfield, escorted even within Pakistani airspace by four PAF F-16As  armed with air-to-air missiles. At the same time, PAF F-7P air defence  fighters, also armed with air-to-air missiles, were on CAP guarding the  aerial frontiers of Pakistan against intruders. Both the nuclear devices  (the bomb mechanism, the HMX explosive shields and casing) and the  fissile material (the highly enriched uranium components) were divided  into separate consignments and flown on separate flights of the  Hercules. The PAEC did not want to put all its nuclear eggs in one  basket in case something adverse was to happen to the aircraft. The  security of the devices and the fissile material was so strict that that  PAF F-16 escort pilots had been secretly given standing orders that in  the unlikely event of the C-130 being hijacked or flown outside of  Pakistani airspace, they were to shoot down the aircraft before it left  Pakistan’s airspace. The F-16s were ordered to escort the C-130s to the  Dalbandin airfield in Balochistan with their radio communications  equipment turned off so that no orders, in the interim, could be  conveyed to them to act otherwise. They were also ordered to ignore any  orders to the contrary that got through to them during the duration of  the flight even if such orders seemingly originated from Air  Headquarters.
On 30 May 1998, when Pakistan sixth nuclear device  shook the ground in the Kharan Desert, Operation Bedaar '98 had  accomplished its mission - that of deterring any misadventure by either  India or Israel to strike at Pakistan's nuclear infrastructure.
But  how real was the possibility of a joint or unilateral Israeli or Indian  raid on Pakistan's nuclear installations during May 1998? The answer is  that we really don't know. The threat is of such a nature that it can  neither be overestimated nor underestimated. Overestimation may lead to  minor diplomatic embarrassment, but underestimation will surely lead to  catastrophe for Pakistan. So Pakistan prefers to overestimate the threat  and pay the price of minor diplomatic embarrassment rather than  underestimate it and face the prospective annihilation. This is not to  say that the threat was never there during May 1998. Pakistan preferred  to be safe rather than sorry. Furthermore, there is concrete evidence  that India and Israeli have been planning exactly such an operation to  neutralize Pakistan's nuclear capability. It is only the PAF and the  risk of nuclear retaliation that is holding them back.
According  to an Indian official, Subramaniam Swamy, a former member of the Hindu  fundamentalist and extremist Bharati Janata Party (BJP) that rules India  today, Israel in 1982 asked him to sound out other Indian leaders to  see if India would grant Israeli warplanes landing and refueling rights  were they to undertake an Osirak-type raid against the Kahuta nuclear  reactor in Pakistan. India refused, probably for a combination of  reasons. As one expert on South Asia speculated:
"First, the  Kahuta facility is well-protected and is thus a hard target to destroy.  Second and more important, India expects that any first strike by India  against Kahuta would be swiftly followed by a Pakistani attack against  India's nuclear facilities. Such an exchange would leave India worse  off, since any potential deterrent capability against China would  thereby be eliminated. Finally, India would be wary of launching such an  attack against Pakistan as it would cause not only great death and  destruction to Pakistan, but could blow radioactive fall-out back over  India. Such an attack against Pakistan would also alienate the Muslim  Middle Eastern states whose amity India has assiduously cultivated."
In  a meeting in Paris in July 1985, senior Israeli diplomats and a  personal envoy of the late Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi reportedly  examined the option in detail. As an incentive, Israel held out an  offer to cooperate with India on military intelligence, defence  production and transfer or technology. Yitzhak Rabin, then the Israeli  Defence Minister, reportedly pinned a lot of hope on that meeting. But  India, which had not yet forged diplomatic ties with the Jewish state,  ultimately rejected the proposal, ostensibly because of the fear of  possible nuclear retaliation by Pakistan and for fear of a possible  backlash by Islamic states, including an oil embargo against it by the  Muslim member-states of OPEC.
In 1991, India and Pakistan signed a  treaty pledging that neither would preemptively attack the nuclear  facilities of the other. However, as India’s and Pakistan’s animosity  grows, this treaty has been rendered toothless and is unlikely to be  adhered to by either side.
In the early 1990s, reports surfaced  in London claiming Israel had repeatedly tried to pressure India into  launching a joint strike on Pakistan's nuclear weapons development plant  at Kahuta. The reports claimed Israeli and Indian pilots would be aided  by detailed satellite photographs of Kahuta provided by convicted spy  Jonathan Pollard.
According to a report in The Washington Times,  citing US officials, Pakistan’s then Foreign Secretary Shamshad Ahmed  had notified the US government and UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan that  Israeli and Indian warplanes, equipped with long-range refueling gear  and operating out of India, had planned to attack Pakistani nuclear  facilities at dawn on Thursday, 28 May 1998.
It is possible that  for Kahuta, the Israelis will use F-15 Strike Eagles to carry out the  actual attack with F-16s providing air cover - a reversal of the roles  in the operation against Osirak. Furthermore, it is almost certain that  if Israel ever attempted to take out Pakistan’s nuclear weapons  facilities, Kahuta will not be the only target and it is highly likely  that the Plutonium Reactor at Khushab and the National Development  Complex (NDC) at Fatehjung, among others, will be additional targets  high on the priority list of the Israelis.
Senior Israeli  military intelligence officials had, of course, dismissed the notion  that any kind of attack was being contemplated against Pakistan.  Pakistan and India "are coming out of the closet and they are trying to  drag us with them," one senior intelligence official said. "We have  nothing to do with it. They are trying to force us into being a party in  this. "The official also maintained that Pakistan's infamous espionage  and counter-espionage agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), was  acting on "faulty intelligence." The Israelis maintained that the  misinformation may have been propaganda fed to them from some other  body, the Iranians perhaps. "They took it seriously. They could have  believed it, but they did the responsible thing and checked it out with  the Americans," the official said. Not that the Americans could be  trusted, given the fact that it was the United States which has supplied  all the information and satellite photos of Pakistan's nuclear  installations to both Israel and India.
The assessment in Israel  is that it does not believe that Pakistan sees the Jewish State as its  enemy - not directly and at least not in the short-run. Israeli  intelligence officials also do not believe that Pakistan has transferred  nuclear or missile technology to nuclear-wannabe Iran. Moreover, they  have no proof that Pakistan is or intends to engage in any nuclear  cooperation with any other country. An Israeli defence analyst commented  to this effect, "Pakistan will not transfer nuclear know-how to any  other Muslim country, not out of fear of Israel, but because that would  diminish its own importance in the Islamic World. Today, Pakistan is the  Islamic world's sole nuclear power, if there are two, Pakistan's  position would be reduced. So it is using its nuclear prowess not only  as a deterrent against its enemies but also to bolster its relationship  with its strategic friends".
Shai Feldman, Director of the Jaffee  Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University in Israel once  stated, "I am certain that the Pakistanis have enough trouble on their  hands and would refrain from doing something that would actually  increase Israel's incentive to cooperate with India. Why would they buy  another enemy when the situation is as bad as it is?" Feldman said.  "They are not stupid, and they probably know that if we had any evidence  of transfer of technology to one of our adversaries then Israel would  react and it wouldn't be very pleasant," he added.
And vice versa, Mr. Feldman.